Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous venous graft versus native artery in acute myocardial infarction

Main Article Content

Ersin Ibisoglu
Bedrettin Boyraz

Abstract

Aim: Percutaneus coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended as the first choice in saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusions because of the high mortality linked with repeated coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG). We observed percutaneous interventions performed in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a CABG history in terms of both short- and long-term efficacy and safety.


Materials and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively at a single centre. In total, 95 patients with a CABG history who were admitted to our hospital with an AMI and received PCI were included in the study.


Results: In-hospital deaths occurred in 4 (4.2%) patients, 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) were present in 8 (8.4%) patients, and 6 (6.3%) patients experienced first-year target vessel revascularisation (TVR). A significant difference was not observed in in-hospital death, 30-days MACE, 1-year TVR and 1-year MACE rates among the patient groups who had PCI in the graft vessel or native vessel.


Conclusion: Our study revealed that a significant difference was not present in terms of MACE in the intervention of SVGs or native coronary arteries. Diabetes mellitus (DM) should be kept in mind as a predictive factor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ibisoglu, E. ., & Boyraz, B. . (2022). Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous venous graft versus native artery in acute myocardial infarction. Annals of Medical Research, 29(3), 211–214. Retrieved from http://www.annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/4103
Section
Original Articles