Allergic reactions to local anesthetics: should we test those with drug allergies and atopy history?

Main Article Content

Eray Yildiz
Fatih Colkesen
Filiz Sadi Aykan
Recep Evcen
Mehmet Kilinc
Gokhan Aytekin
Sevket Arslan

Abstract

Aim: Many patients are referred to allergy clinics for allergy tests to local anesthetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a history of atopy and drug hypersensitivity on allergy tests made with local anesthetics.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was made of the records of patients referred to our clinic within a 5-year period because of a suspicion of allergy to local anesthetics, and who were applied with skin tests and subcutaneous challenge tests.
Results: Evaluation was made of a total of 138 patients, comprising 114 (82.6%) females and 24 (17.4%) males with a mean age of 45.35 ± 14.13 years. A reaction during a dental procedure was reported in 99 (71.7%) patients. Mepivacaine was the most tested local anesthetic (n = 66, 40.2%).  A positive reaction was determined in the skin tests made with local anesthetics in 6 (4.3%) patients. Lidocaine was the local anesthetic most often showing a positive reaction (n = 3, 50%). A history of atopy was present in 30 (21.7%) patients. No correlation was determined between atopy history and the development of a positive reaction to local anesthetics (p = 0.086). In the cases determined with a positive reaction to local anesthetics, there was a greater rate of history of hypersensitivity to drugs other than local anesthetics (p = 0.012).
Conclusion: Patients with a history of drug hypersensitivity reaction should be tested in respect of local anesthetic allergy prior to a procedure to be made with local anesthetics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yildiz, E. ., Colkesen, F. ., Sadi Aykan, F. ., Evcen, R. ., Kilinc, M. ., Aytekin, G. ., & Arslan, S. . (2022). Allergic reactions to local anesthetics: should we test those with drug allergies and atopy history?. Annals of Medical Research, 29(6), 623–626. Retrieved from http://www.annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/4122
Section
Original Articles