Four-year evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics and drug resistance patterns: A retrospective analysis of smear microscopy, MTB/RIF PCR, and culture-confirmed Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates

Main Article Content

Baris Can
Gizem Nigdelioglu
Elvan Sayin
Arzu Ilki

Abstract

Aim: Accurate and timely diagnosis of tuberculosis remains a major clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of direct smear microscopy and MTB/RIF PCR compared with culture, and to assess first-line drug resistance patterns among Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) isolates.


Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed non-duplicate mycobacterial culture records obtained between 2020 and 2023 at a tertiary care center. Culture-confirmed MTBC cases served as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of direct smear microscopy and MTB/RIF PCR was evaluated in patients who underwent both the index test and the culture. Drug susceptibility testing was performed for first-line antituberculosis agents, including isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and streptomycin. The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE and STARD guidelines.


Results: A total of 8,863 mycobacterial cultures were evaluated, yielding 165 MTBC-positive isolates. MTB positivity rates decreased from 2.18% in 2020 to 1.31% in 2023. When data from all years were combined, direct smear microscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 34.5% and a specificity of 99.8%, whereas MTB/RIF PCR showed a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 98.5%, all for culture-confirmed tuberculosis. Drug susceptibility testing was available for 160 isolates. Resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and streptomycin was detected in 14.4%, 1.9%, 6.3%, and 8.8% of isolates, respectively. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis was identified in 1.25% of cases.


Conclusion: Direct smear microscopy exhibited limited sensitivity despite high specificity, whereas MTB/RIF PCR demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance and a high negative predictive value. Although overall drug resistance rates were relatively low, the presence of isoniazid resistance underscores the importance of routine susceptibility testing in the management of tuberculosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Can B, Nigdelioglu G, Sayin E, Ilki A. Four-year evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics and drug resistance patterns: A retrospective analysis of smear microscopy, MTB/RIF PCR, and culture-confirmed Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Ann Med Res [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 25 [cited 2026 Sep. 5];33(8):403-8. Available from: http://www.annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/4947

References