Comparison of the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine-magnesium combination in sedation management in intensive care

Authors

Keywords:

Intensive care, Sedation, Dexmedetomidine, Magnesium, Cortisol

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was  to evaluate the correlation  of sedation with subjective clinical sedation scores and compare plasma cortisol levels as an objective marker between two groups: patients sedated with dexmedetomidine alone and patients sedated with a combination  of dexmedetomidine and magnesium via mechanical ventilation.

Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group 1 (dexmedetomidine group) received a loading dose 1μg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion  0.2-1.4 μg/kg/hour for 24 hours. Group 2 (dexmedetomidine+magnesium group) received a loading dose  1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine, followed by a continuous infusion  0.2-1.4 μg/kg/hour for 24 hours, along with two bolus doses of 2 grams of magnesium and a continuous infusion of 16mg/24 hours. Sedation scale scores, Glasgow coma scores, heart rate, and plasma cortisol levels at baseline and at 24 hours were recorded throughout the 24-hour study period.

Results: On the 24th hour, cortisol levels were significantly lower in Group 2 (p<0.05). Heart rate was significantly lower in Group 2, except at baseline (p<0.05). No significant differences between the groups regarding sedation scale scores or Glasgow coma scores (p>0.05) were found.

Conclusion: Although adding magnesium to dexmedetomidine provided sufficient sedation and may have enhanced compliance with mechanical ventilation, no significant difference was found in achieving the target sedation levels in a clinical setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Comparison of the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine-magnesium combination in sedation management in intensive care. Ann Med Res [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 25 [cited 2025 Oct. 17];32(6):226-30. Available from: http://www.annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/4819